<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Time Capsule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/</link>
	<description>by Tom Scheinfeldt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: History Carnival XLI &#124; ClioWeb</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>History Carnival XLI &#124; ClioWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] The big questions this time around for digital historians are: What do we leave behind? How do we find it? And who&#8217;s in charge? Past Thinking and Tom Scheinfeldt&#8217;s Found History discuss History Matters&#8217;s effort to &#8220;[raise] awareness of the importance of history in our everyday lives and encouraging involvement in heritage in England and Wales.&#8221; Found History also critiques the Yahoo! Time Capsule. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The big questions this time around for digital historians are: What do we leave behind? How do we find it? And who&#8217;s in charge? Past Thinking and Tom Scheinfeldt&#8217;s Found History discuss History Matters&#8217;s effort to &#8220;[raise] awareness of the importance of history in our everyday lives and encouraging involvement in heritage in England and Wales.&#8221; Found History also critiques the Yahoo! Time Capsule. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, I&#039;ll have to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, I&#8217;ll have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidR</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2006/10/11/yahoo-time-capsule/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hi !

I have studied the time capsules idea/phenomenon for the last 2 years.  Yahoo&#039;s time capsule carry the same flaw as any &#039;generalized&#039; time capsule.  What is the value in this?  By default every time capsule is flawed as it&#039;s content is edited. The second largest flaw is there is no individual recipient which creates messages that are trivial in nature.

To really have value in a time capsule, there needs to be a clear contributor and recipient.  A parent-child is the perfect example.

Why all this?  I was writing a journal for my daughter and I couldn&#039;t write what I wanted since she might read it at age 5.  Thus I created www.electronictimecapsule.com

I applaude Yahoo&#039;s initiative...althoug I think they could have brought the time capsule concept to the 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi !</p>
<p>I have studied the time capsules idea/phenomenon for the last 2 years.  Yahoo&#8217;s time capsule carry the same flaw as any &#8216;generalized&#8217; time capsule.  What is the value in this?  By default every time capsule is flawed as it&#8217;s content is edited. The second largest flaw is there is no individual recipient which creates messages that are trivial in nature.</p>
<p>To really have value in a time capsule, there needs to be a clear contributor and recipient.  A parent-child is the perfect example.</p>
<p>Why all this?  I was writing a journal for my daughter and I couldn&#8217;t write what I wanted since she might read it at age 5.  Thus I created <a href="http://www.electronictimecapsule.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.electronictimecapsule.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronictimecapsule.com</a></p>
<p>I applaude Yahoo&#8217;s initiative&#8230;althoug I think they could have brought the time capsule concept to the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

