http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/ by Tom Scheinfeldt Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:11:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-10355 Tell History - Historical scholarship: "it wasn't always so" Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:09:21 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-10355 [...] an essay, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” Tom Scheinfeldt suggests that the field of history is seeing a shift from a century of [...] [...] an essay, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” Tom Scheinfeldt suggests that the field of history is seeing a shift from a century of [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-10333 » Hacking the Disciplinary Divide Adam Turner Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:56:52 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-10333 [...] with a more flexible disciplinary framework [see, for example, Tom Scheinfeldt's piece on disciplines of methodology (and the associated comments), as well as Stephen Ramsay's, "Centers of Attention"], [...] [...] with a more flexible disciplinary framework [see, for example, Tom Scheinfeldt's piece on disciplines of methodology (and the associated comments), as well as Stephen Ramsay's, "Centers of Attention"], [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-10125 Ideologia czy metodologia w nowej humanistyce? « Historia i Media Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:44:26 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-10125 [...] strona HiM dwa lata temu pojawiło się krótkie omówienie poświęconego temu tematowi wpisu z bloga Toma [...] [...] strona HiM dwa lata temu pojawiło się krótkie omówienie poświęconego temu tematowi wpisu z bloga Toma [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-10091 05. New Kinds of Questions | History 9808 Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:06:14 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-10091 [...] Scheinfeldt, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” Found History, 13 March [...] [...] Scheinfeldt, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” Found History, 13 March [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-9847 Hacking the Disciplinary Divide « Adam Turner Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:07 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-9847 [...] with a more flexible disciplinary framework [see, for example, Tom Scheinfeldt's piece on disciplines of methodology (and the associated comments), as well as Stephen Ramsay's, "Centers of Attention"], [...] [...] with a more flexible disciplinary framework [see, for example, Tom Scheinfeldt's piece on disciplines of methodology (and the associated comments), as well as Stephen Ramsay's, "Centers of Attention"], [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8928 A New Dawn for Methodologies « Text Lexica Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:04:14 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8928 [...] rhetorical effect is almost always strongly political in nature. After reading Scheinfeldt’s Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?, I have to question whether criticism might benefit more from new methodological approaches which [...] [...] rhetorical effect is almost always strongly political in nature. After reading Scheinfeldt’s Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?, I have to question whether criticism might benefit more from new methodological approaches which [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8823 Mining Old News For Fresh Historcal Insight - Trevor Owens Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:13:44 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8823 [...] my mind this contributes to ongoing discussions about the role that digital tools should play in re-framing conversations about historical methodology. Since the structure of the archive plays a significant role in the structure and character of the [...] [...] my mind this contributes to ongoing discussions about the role that digital tools should play in re-framing conversations about historical methodology. Since the structure of the archive plays a significant role in the structure and character of the [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8739 THATCamp » Blog Archive Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:48:31 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8739 [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...] [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8738 Clio Machine » Disciplinary Heresies and the Digital Humanities Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:48:09 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8738 [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...] [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8736 Las humanidades digitales en 2008 (3) « Clionauta: Blog de Historia Mon, 25 May 2009 07:43:30 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8736 [...] digitales,  se dedica mucha atención al desarrollo de metodologías de investigación. En su “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”,  Tom Scheinfeldt sugiere que las humanidades académicas están empezando a inclinarse hacia [...] [...] digitales,  se dedica mucha atención al desarrollo de metodologías de investigación. En su “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”,  Tom Scheinfeldt sugiere que las humanidades académicas están empezando a inclinarse hacia [...]

]]>