http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:45:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8928 A New Dawn for Methodologies « Text Lexica Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:04:14 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8928 [...] rhetorical effect is almost always strongly political in nature. After reading Scheinfeldt’s Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?, I have to question whether criticism might benefit more from new methodological approaches which [...] [...] rhetorical effect is almost always strongly political in nature. After reading Scheinfeldt’s Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?, I have to question whether criticism might benefit more from new methodological approaches which [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8823 Mining Old News For Fresh Historcal Insight - Trevor Owens Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:13:44 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8823 [...] my mind this contributes to ongoing discussions about the role that digital tools should play in re-framing conversations about historical methodology. Since the structure of the archive plays a significant role in the structure and character of the [...] [...] my mind this contributes to ongoing discussions about the role that digital tools should play in re-framing conversations about historical methodology. Since the structure of the archive plays a significant role in the structure and character of the [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8739 THATCamp » Blog Archive Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:48:31 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8739 [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...] [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8738 Clio Machine » Disciplinary Heresies and the Digital Humanities Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:48:09 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8738 [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...] [...] Digital humanists have already written and talked quite a bit about how tenure and promotion committees have rejected some digital scholarship for being non-traditional.  Further compounding this problem are what appear to be significant cultural differences.  Almost all traditional humanists work on their scholarship in isolation; digital humanists collaborate often, sometimes because this is the only way to assemble the requisite technical knowledge.  Traditional humanists distinguish their scholarship from that produced in the social sciences, which they often think lowers itself to the level of policy concerns.  Digital humanists, by contrast, are almost universally oriented towards serving the needs of the public.  And while traditional humanists place a premium on theoretical innovation, digital humanists have so far focused much more on embracing and pioneering new methodologies. [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8736 Las humanidades digitales en 2008 (3) « Clionauta: Blog de Historia Mon, 25 May 2009 07:43:30 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8736 [...] digitales,  se dedica mucha atención al desarrollo de metodologías de investigación. En su “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”,  Tom Scheinfeldt sugiere que las humanidades académicas están empezando a inclinarse hacia [...] [...] digitales,  se dedica mucha atención al desarrollo de metodologías de investigación. En su “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”,  Tom Scheinfeldt sugiere que las humanidades académicas están empezando a inclinarse hacia [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-8719 Digital Humanities in 2008, III: Research « Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:13:54 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-8719 [...] humanities emerges, much attention is being devoted to developing research methodologies. In “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?,” Tom Scheinfeldt suggests that humanities scholarship is beginning to tilt toward methodology, [...] [...] humanities emerges, much attention is being devoted to developing research methodologies. In “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?,” Tom Scheinfeldt suggests that humanities scholarship is beginning to tilt toward methodology, [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-7595 Trevor Owens » Blog Archive » Sunrise on Methodology and Radical Transparency of Sources in Historical Writing Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:47:24 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-7595 [...] questions of ideology, arguments about which historical-isms are the best for a given task. Tom, suggests that new media tools (like text mining) challenge historians to consider methodological questions [...] [...] questions of ideology, arguments about which historical-isms are the best for a given task. Tom, suggests that new media tools (like text mining) challenge historians to consider methodological questions [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-7539 Methodologies and the (Digital) History Major « history-ing Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:32:26 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-7539 [...] level. Tom Scheinfeldt wrote a particularly incisive blog post on this topic provocatively titled, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”: “I believe we are at a similar moment of change right now, that we are entering a new phase [...] [...] level. Tom Scheinfeldt wrote a particularly incisive blog post on this topic provocatively titled, “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?”: “I believe we are at a similar moment of change right now, that we are entering a new phase [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-7431 Investigations of a Dog » Yahoo and the semantic web Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:44:07 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-7431 [...] is as useful as possible. This is exactly what Tom Scheinfeldt was getting at in his recent post at Found History. Although I took issue with some of the things he said about ideology, his central points were spot [...] [...] is as useful as possible. This is exactly what Tom Scheinfeldt was getting at in his recent post at Found History. Although I took issue with some of the things he said about ideology, his central points were spot [...]

]]> http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/comment-page-1/#comment-7318 THATCamp » Blog Archive » Scholarship and Digital Humanities Thu, 29 May 2008 13:06:04 +0000 http://www.foundhistory.org/2008/03/13/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/#comment-7318 [...] I mentioned this in my earlier post–there are many faculty grappling with how to define and evaluate the quality of applied, public, collaborative, and/or digital scholarship. The digital work takes many forms including publishing a monograph as an electronic book, developing research tools and models, blogging, building Web resources for education, and producing public projects like Mark’s Euclid Corridor Oral History Project in Cleveland. I’ve written about this a bit on Tellhistory. I would like first to learn, from those more directly involved, about broader digital humanities initiatives on this front and to discuss what more needs to be done. When departments with public history graduate programs do not recognize traditional peer-reviewed print publications about public history as scholarship — it seems like there is a lot that needs to be done to support the greater emphasis on methodology, collaboration, and organization that Tom Scheinfeldt addressed in “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” [...] [...] I mentioned this in my earlier post–there are many faculty grappling with how to define and evaluate the quality of applied, public, collaborative, and/or digital scholarship. The digital work takes many forms including publishing a monograph as an electronic book, developing research tools and models, blogging, building Web resources for education, and producing public projects like Mark’s Euclid Corridor Oral History Project in Cleveland. I’ve written about this a bit on Tellhistory. I would like first to learn, from those more directly involved, about broader digital humanities initiatives on this front and to discuss what more needs to be done. When departments with public history graduate programs do not recognize traditional peer-reviewed print publications about public history as scholarship — it seems like there is a lot that needs to be done to support the greater emphasis on methodology, collaboration, and organization that Tom Scheinfeldt addressed in “Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?” [...]

]]>