<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But is it scholarship?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/</link>
	<description>by Tom Scheinfeldt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-8724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/#comment-8724</guid>
		<description>Actually, answering the &quot;who cares&quot; question is what makes digital humanities more interesting than, say, science. (Ohhh! Burn! I&#039;m taking the scientists *down*!)

Though I&#039;m just dipping my toe into the DH waters, it seems that contextualizing -- that is in this case, answering the question of value -- is the &#039;humanities&#039; part of DH. Otherwise, it&#039;s just information technology, applied to one area of knowledge. Doing digital humanities means you *get to* answer the &quot;why&quot; while doing fun tech stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, answering the &#8220;who cares&#8221; question is what makes digital humanities more interesting than, say, science. (Ohhh! Burn! I&#8217;m taking the scientists *down*!)</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m just dipping my toe into the DH waters, it seems that contextualizing &#8212; that is in this case, answering the question of value &#8212; is the &#8216;humanities&#8217; part of DH. Otherwise, it&#8217;s just information technology, applied to one area of knowledge. Doing digital humanities means you *get to* answer the &#8220;why&#8221; while doing fun tech stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scheinfeldt</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-8723</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Scheinfeldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/#comment-8723</guid>
		<description>@jmcclurken No doubt deans, promotion committees, etc. care. And of course we need to pay attention to that fact. Just not too much attention...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jmcclurken No doubt deans, promotion committees, etc. care. And of course we need to pay attention to that fact. Just not too much attention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmcclurken</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-8722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmcclurken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/#comment-8722</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for it, but faculty are asked to compartmentalize all of what we do into a few reductionist categories.  

&quot;Who cares?&quot; -- Sadly, deans, faculty colleagues, and tenure and promotion committees.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for it, but faculty are asked to compartmentalize all of what we do into a few reductionist categories.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Who cares?&#8221; &#8212; Sadly, deans, faculty colleagues, and tenure and promotion committees&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Fluharty</title>
		<link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Fluharty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundhistory.org/2009/04/06/but-is-it-scholarship/#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>Great point.  But I think digital humanists will have to own up to the scientific nature of their work if they move into text mining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point.  But I think digital humanists will have to own up to the scientific nature of their work if they move into text mining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
